Smaller Family Offices Are Running Without Basic Cybersecurity Structures. AI Is About to Make That Expensive.

Written by:

Steve Marcinuk

Date:

16 Jul 2026

Share

Share via Facebook

Share via Linkedin

Share via X

Copy to clipboard

The assumption that family offices are locked down and careful with security – given how much capital they manage – does not hold up once you look past the largest operations. Smaller family offices, particularly those managing one to three portfolio companies, often lack the cybersecurity maturity that outsiders assume they have, according to Vijaya Rao, Founder & CEO of Techvio, a cybersecurity and automation consultancy serving small and mid-sized businesses in the Pennsylvania, Delaware, and New Jersey region. With AI accelerating both the sophistication and automation of cyberattacks, that gap between perception and reality is becoming a liability that touches every asset class in the portfolio, including real estate holdings where wire fraud already runs rampant.

The Cost Center Mentality

One of the more persistent problems Rao encounters is that smaller family offices treat technology as a cost center rather than an investment. This framing leads to chronic underinvestment, until something breaks.

“When you start looking at something like a cost center, you tend to invest less in that. And then as a result, when problems arise, you invest more to fix those instead,” she said.

In cybersecurity, deferred investment compounds quickly. A single breach can cost a small business up to $200,000, according to Rao – a figure that could put some operations out of business entirely. This estimate comes from her consulting practice and reflects the scale of risk she encounters, not an independently verified industry average.

For property investors and family offices holding real estate, this means that a cybersecurity failure at one portfolio company can cascade into legal liability, reputational damage, and operational disruption across the entire office.

Where the Gaps Actually Are

Rao uses a straightforward diagnostic: match the sensitivity of data a company holds against the maturity of its security posture. The most concerning situations arise when an organization holds highly sensitive information – healthcare records, social security numbers, banking details – but has minimal security infrastructure around it.

“Don’t tell me what business you are in, tell me what type of data you have. How sensitive is it?” she said.

Family offices with healthcare holdings tend to be somewhat more mature on this front, largely because healthcare has long been tightly regulated. But offices holding companies in other sectors often lack even basic access controls. Rao described implementing least-privilege access structures at family offices where 15 people all had access to the same information regardless of their role, a setup that unnecessarily multiplies exposure. Restricting access so that employees see only what their work requires is one of the fastest ways to reduce risk without spending on new tools.

Phishing as the Entry Point

Wire fraud, a persistent concern in real estate transactions, typically begins with something that looks unremarkable. Rao noted that more than 80% of cyber compromises start with someone clicking a link from what appears to be a known contact. At one family office engagement, she implemented monthly phishing simulations, emails sent on unpredictable schedules to test whether employees could identify suspicious messages.

“Once they have gotten the hang of it and they understand what a phishing email looks like, then it becomes less and less likely that people would click on it and compromise anything,” she said.

She also described automating payment collection processes so that sensitive financial information – credit card numbers, wire details – no longer passes through email or phone calls. Reducing human touchpoints in payment workflows shrinks the surface area for social engineering attacks. For anyone involved in real estate closings, where wire instructions routinely move by email, this kind of automation addresses one of the most common fraud vectors directly.

The Acquisition Blind Spot

Smaller family offices may be particularly exposed during acquisitions. Rao observed that when family offices acquire smaller companies, due diligence focuses almost exclusively on revenue, EBITDA, customer concentration, and similar financial metrics. Whether the target company has meaningful security infrastructure in place rarely enters the discussion.

“If that company gets bought and then suddenly gets compromised, the entire risk then is kind of toppled right upside down,” she said.

The integration period after an acquisition – when systems are being connected, and data is being migrated – is precisely when vulnerabilities tend to be exploited. A family office that acquires a company without assessing its security posture is inheriting risk it has not priced.

AI on Both Sides

Looking ahead, Rao identified AI governance and data privacy as areas where smaller family offices are likely to fall behind. Larger companies are already investing in AI-assisted security detection and response. But the same tools are available to attackers, who are using AI to automate and accelerate compromises.

“Anybody that tells you that I’m sure that this is how it’s going to be in the next 12 months, I think probably is lying because I don’t think anybody has that crystal ball,” she said.

Regulatory frameworks remain unsettled. Governments have not established clear governance around AI, and data privacy rules may change, which means family offices cannot rely on current compliance standards as a permanent baseline.

Rao’s recommendation is modest: engage experienced practitioners in a fractional capacity to build secured automation before it becomes urgent. The offices that treat security as a forethought rather than an afterthought, she argued, will pull significantly ahead, not because they spend more, but because they spend before the breach rather than after it. That requires redefining what return on investment means for technology spending: measuring it not by revenue generated but by loss avoided.

About the Expert: Vijaya Rao is Founder and CEO of Techvio, a cybersecurity and automation consultancy serving small and mid-sized businesses across Pennsylvania, Delaware, and New Jersey.

This article is based on information provided by the expert source cited above. It is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or real estate advice. Readers should conduct their own research and consult qualified professionals before making any real estate or financial decisions.