For a $50 million construction project, procuring materials typically takes two to three months. For projects in the $1 billion to $2 billion range, procurement alone can consume half a year. In most industries, a supply chain bottleneck of that duration would be treated as a crisis. In construction, it is treated as normal.
The timeline does not reflect material scarcity. A single large project may involve more than 1,000 individual construction materials, including facade panels, concrete, door handles, and light fixtures. Procurement teams typically source these by manually reviewing supplier catalogs, sending individual quote requests via email and phone, and tracking the entire process across spreadsheets and email chains. There is no centralized platform equivalent to what exists in consumer goods or food delivery.
The downstream consequences extend beyond procurement departments. Delayed material sourcing pushes construction schedules, increases carrying costs for project financing, and creates cascading coordination problems across trades. For investors and asset holders, procurement inefficiency contributes directly to timeline risk.
The procurement problem is one symptom of a broader coordination structure the construction industry has normalized. A single architecture project requires coordination among the architecture firm, the general contractor, and anywhere from 50 to 500 suppliers, all working across different systems with different workflows.
Coordination often lives in group chats, Slack threads, and email chains rather than in a unified record. Material lead times become difficult to track because by the time a procurement team has contacted multiple suppliers about availability, the original timeline assumptions are already outdated. Aurora Zelia, Founder & CEO of BIM Engine, describes the problem concretely: by the time you have asked ten suppliers for their lead times, two days have already passed, and the numbers need recalculating.
“Currently the solution is you have 50 SaaS to just work on one project,” Zelia says. “There are so many people, so it’s so hard to keep track of.”
For firms financing or holding construction assets, this fragmentation creates risk that is difficult to quantify but consistently present. When coordination history lives in individual email inboxes rather than a shared platform, the ability to audit decisions, track change orders, or identify the source of a delay is limited.
Time is arguably construction’s costliest resource. Fragmented coordination increases the likelihood of errors, and errors consume time that compounds across a project’s schedule. “One of the most expensive lessons in architecture usually is time,” Zelia says. “You spend too much time, or you make some mistakes that you need to fix.”
Faster procurement means earlier construction starts, reduced financing carry, and more predictable delivery timelines for developers and investors. For general contractors, faster quote turnaround translates directly to faster project execution and improved cash flow.
The inefficiency also cuts against suppliers. In the current environment, suppliers invest significant time responding to individual quote requests from contractors who may or may not convert. A platform that aggregates demand and routes qualified requests to relevant suppliers can increase supplier revenue while reducing cost of sales. This dynamic makes the problem addressable from both ends of the transaction.
Several platforms have begun attempting to address procurement fragmentation with marketplace and matching models. One example is BIM Engine’s Material Engine, which operates as a three-sided marketplace connecting architects, general contractors, and suppliers. On the supplier side, the system extracts product data directly from supplier websites and PDF specification sheets rather than relying on manual catalog listing. On the architect side, it matches specified materials to available products using project context, including location, climate, compliance requirements, and building type.
“Now contractors just need to click, one click, and they can ask for all the prices all at the same time,” Zelia says.
Its version of this approach also includes a financial product offering net 30 and net 60 payment terms, addressing cash flow friction in the procurement process, with the procurement cycle, from specification matching to quote collection, recorded on a single platform rather than scattered across email and chat history.
The underlying need extends beyond any single solution: as more materials, more suppliers, and more compliance requirements enter a project, the coordination gap only widens without some form of centralized system.
The underlying problem, months-long procurement cycles and coordination spread across dozens of disconnected tools, is present across the industry regardless of project scale. For developers and investors, the practical question is whether procurement automation, in whatever form it takes, compresses timelines enough to reduce carrying costs and delivery risk on specific projects measurably.
Some platforms claim the difference can be dramatic: a procurement cycle that currently takes months completed in under a week. If that kind of compression holds at scale across the industry, it represents a material change in how construction project timelines are calculated.
About the Expert: Aurora Zelia is Founder and CEO of BIM Engine, an AI startup automating repetitive architecture workflows, with a focus on construction materials procurement through its Material Engine product.
This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or investment advice. The views and opinions expressed herein reflect those of the individuals quoted and do not represent an endorsement of any company, product, or service mentioned. Readers should conduct their own due diligence and consult qualified professionals before making any investment decisions.
Explore similar articles from Our Team of Experts.
While luxury condos and Class A multifamily properties dominate Miami’s real estate headlines, a different investment strategy is generating stronger returns for investors in the region. Lawrence Resnick is a Realtor at The Paz Group who focuses on commercial and multifamily transactions across Miami-Dade and Broward County. He says the properties producing the best yields ...
When investors evaluate an industrial property, they typically see one rent figure attached to one building. The yard – the paved or unpaved land surrounding that building – gets bundled into the deal as though it were incidental. At firms specializing in industrial outdoor storage, analysts argue this is a mispricing. The land itself generates ...
National headlines suggest property insurance is collapsing everywhere. Coverage is shrinking, premiums are skyrocketing, and owners are getting squeezed. According to Andrew Kowalske, Chief Product Officer at Blitz Insurance, the picture is more specific. Most markets are moving in a direction that favors property owners right now. Kowalske’s perspective comes from the excess and surplus ...
Investors who purchased Cleveland apartment buildings in 2021 or 2022 with 3% mortgages and top-of-market pricing now face a sale price gap they cannot close. Mortgage rates sit in the six-and-a-half-percent range, which means buyers today need higher cap rates to make the numbers work, and higher cap rates mean lower prices. Owners who stretched ...
When a city converts office buildings into housing, the headline usually celebrates new apartments. What gets less attention is what happens to the businesses that now have fewer places to lease. In Manhattan, residential conversions have removed enough supply to shift the power balance between landlords and tenants, and the effect is accelerating, according to ...
Most commercial real estate investors still treat Arkansas as a flyover state. The numbers suggest otherwise: office, retail, and industrial properties across the state are running at 3 to 6% vacancy across most asset classes, according to Bryce Richardson, president of commercial sales at Brick Real Estate in Faulkner County, Arkansas. National office vacancy hovered ...
