Most Roofing Contractors Will Tell You What You Want to Hear. A Few Will Tell You What You Need to Know

Written by:

Steve Marcinuk

Date:

01 May 2026

Share

Share via Facebook

Share via Linkedin

Share via X

Copy to clipboard

When a daycare facility in Massachusetts needed to have a leaking flat roof repaired, three contractors came out and recommended the same thing: shingles. It was the familiar answer, the expected one — and according to Adrian Ferreira, it was the wrong one. Ferreira, supervisor of Ferreira Company, a roofing and waterproofing contractor serving Bristol and Plymouth counties in Massachusetts and the Providence area of Rhode Island, took one look at that roof and proposed something different: an EPDM rubber roofing system, more expensive upfront, but actually built for a flat surface. The customer hesitated. So Ferreira made an unusual offer — do the job first, get paid only if it works. Two months later, after heavy rain and snow, the customer paid. The roof held.

That story says something larger than one good contractor doing good work. It points to a gap that homeowners face constantly: the difference between a contractor who tells you what’s easiest to sell and one who tells you what your property actually needs. In a market where bids are easy to collect and hard to evaluate, that gap has real consequences — for how long repairs last, how much money gets spent twice, and whether the person you hired ever picks up the phone again.

The Gap Nobody Talks About

Hiring a contractor should be straightforward. You have a problem, you get a few bids, you pick one. But the process that feels like due diligence often isn’t — because the thing you’re trying to evaluate, the quality and honesty of the work, isn’t visible until long after the contract is signed and the crew has left. What homeowners are actually navigating is an industry with a wide variance in standards and very little transparency about where any given contractor falls on that spectrum. The contractors who compete on price know this. The lowest bid wins the job, the margin gets protected somewhere in the materials or the shortcuts, and the homeowner finds out a year or two later when the problem comes back.

Some contractors build their business in deliberate opposition to that model. Operating within a tight geographic focus — a choice that reflects a philosophy, not a limitation — they become the kind of contractor that homeowners call back. Their client base tends to look similar: lawyers, teachers, small business owners, and first responders — people who understand the value of the work, want to feel confident in their investment, and need to know that someone will still answer when they call. That kind of relationship doesn’t happen by underbidding the competition. It happens by being right consistently over a long period of time.

Why “Cheaper” Costs More

Material costs go up every year. Labor costs go up. The contractors who absorb those increases by cutting corners pass the real cost directly to the homeowner, just on a delayed schedule. Ferreira’s view on rising costs is blunt: “Things go up every year. You just gotta get used to it. It’s not going to stop, it’s not going to change. That’s how it is.” The contractors who accept that reality price work accordingly. The ones who don’t find other ways to protect their margin — and those ways rarely benefit the homeowner.

Experienced labor matters more than it might appear on an estimate. Crew continuity — the kind that comes from low turnover and long tenure — shows up directly in the consistency of the work. A team that has worked together for years on the same types of projects in the same region is different from a rotating crew assembled job by job. For homeowners, the practical difference is fewer surprises, fewer callbacks, and work that holds up as described. High turnover is common in this industry, and it is worth asking about before signing anything.

Younger homeowners — those in their mid-twenties to early thirties — represent a shrinking share of renovation spending, while homeowners 55 and above are increasingly driving demand. These are property owners with decades of equity, long memories, and direct experience of what happens when work is done cheaply. They are not looking for the lowest bid. They are looking for someone they can trust with a significant investment in a property they intend to keep. Contractors who have maintained standards through years of market pressure are positioned to serve that client. Contractors who haven’t are.

What Transparency Actually Looks Like

The daycare roof story is useful not just as an illustration of technical knowledge, but as an example of what genuine transparency requires. Three experienced contractors looked at the same roof and recommended the wrong solution — not necessarily out of dishonesty, but because shingles were familiar, easier to sell, and simpler to explain. Recommending a more appropriate but more expensive solution to a hesitant customer means having a harder conversation, defending a higher price, and staking your reputation on an outcome. Most contractors avoid that. The ones worth hiring don’t.

That same principle applies to insurance work, where contractor transparency is tested most directly. Claims are rarely simple — documentation requirements are detailed, adjusters push back, and the process demands persistence. A contractor who documents thoroughly and advocates clearly on a client’s behalf is the difference between a fair settlement and leaving money on the table. “Whatever they ask me, I present,” Ferreira says. “You charge this much for this? Here is the reason. That’s how much it costs, and that’s why I’m going to do it.” That kind of accountability doesn’t require a special relationship with insurers. It requires preparation and a willingness to defend the work.

Transparency also shapes how honest contractors approach projects that don’t require major work. In a market where homeowners are increasingly cautious — opting to maintain and upgrade existing spaces rather than take on large expansions — a contractor who gives an honest assessment of what actually needs to be done, rather than what generates the largest invoice, builds the kind of trust that turns a single project into a long-term relationship.

The Contractor Worth Keeping

The questions worth asking before hiring a roofing or waterproofing contractor are not complicated, but they cut through a lot of noise. How long have they been operating in this specific area? How long do their employees stay? Can they explain not just what they’re recommending but why — and why the alternatives are less appropriate for your situation? Will they stand behind the work in a way that’s concrete rather than vague? These are not unreasonable standards. They are the baseline for a contractor relationship that doesn’t become a problem.

Longevity in a specific community is one of the more reliable signals available to homeowners. A business that cuts corners, overpromises, or disappears after the check clears cannot sustain a decades-long reputation within a defined service area. The market remembers, even when individual homeowners don’t have time to research. Referrals accumulate around contractors who do the work right. So do complaints — they just travel more quietly.

The broader lesson is applicable anywhere: the contractors worth keeping are the ones who are still there — still in the same area, still employing the same people, still answering the phone — years after the job is done. That continuity doesn’t happen by accident. It’s the result of doing the work right the first time and being honest about what the work requires. In an industry where that standard is less common than it should be, finding a contractor who meets it is worth the effort.

About the Expert: Adrian Ferreira is the supervisor at Ferreira Company, a roofing and waterproofing contractor founded in 1978 that serves Bristol and Plymouth counties in Massachusetts and the Providence area of Rhode Island.

This article is based on information provided by the expert source cited above. It is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or real estate advice. Readers should conduct their own research and consult qualified professionals before making any real estate or financial decisions.