

The active adult housing market in Central Florida is expanding beyond traditional retirement hubs, as developers respond to demand for boutique communities that offer accessibility and natu...




For many Chicago buyers, the traditional path to homeownership is getting harder to follow. Higher mortgage rates and rising single-family home prices have pushed monthly payments beyond what feels workable. As a result, more buyers are rethinking what ownership looks like – and turning to small apartment buildings instead.
“We’re seeing a lot less institutional money going into these smaller properties these days,” says Niko Apostal, managing broker at Essex Three-Twelve in Chicago. “It’s mostly individuals.” Many of those buyers are people planning to live in one unit of a two- to four-unit building while renting out the others, using that income to help cover the mortgage.
These modest multi-unit buildings – often tucked onto residential side streets or sitting above neighborhood storefronts – are selling steadily. For buyers priced out of single-family homes, they offer a more workable entry point into ownership, combining a place to live with rental income that makes the numbers easier to manage.
Two- to four-unit buildings are a familiar part of Chicago’s housing landscape, particularly in older, walkable neighborhoods built before single-family zoning became dominant. Across much of the city, small multi-unit buildings line residential side streets and sit above storefronts on commercial corridors – meaning rental units are woven into everyday neighborhoods rather than concentrated in large apartment complexes or isolated developments. That pattern gives Chicago buyers options that are less common in many U.S. markets, where housing stock skews more heavily toward single-family homes or large, investor-owned apartment buildings.
Today, that model is drawing renewed interest as mortgage rates remain elevated and single-family homes feel financially out of reach for many buyers. A small apartment building allows an owner to live in one unit while using rent from the others to offset the mortgage and ongoing costs. Apostal has first-hand experience with this process. “I own three apartments myself,” he says. “The rent from those few units pays for all of my living expenses.” For buyers focused on making ownership workable rather than maximizing scale, that combination can be more realistic than buying a standalone house.
What’s changing isn’t just buyer interest, but availability. Many of Chicago’s two- to four-unit buildings have been owned by the same families for decades. As those longtime owners age or move into assisted living, more of these properties are coming to market – often after years of owner occupancy and regular upkeep.
“We’re seeing a generational handoff,” Apostal says. Buildings that were once held for stability rather than scale are now being sold into a very different housing environment. For buyers, that means more listings that are already rented, functional, and livable, rather than speculative rehabs.
At the same time, institutional buyers remain largely absent from this corner of the market, reducing the kind of bidding pressure that pushed prices sharply higher in previous cycles. Combined with a slower, more deliberate pace of deal-making, that has created a window for individual buyers who are willing to run the numbers carefully and take on small-scale ownership.
One reason two- to four-unit buildings remain accessible to individual buyers is how they’re financed. Under federal lending rules, buildings with up to four units are treated as residential properties, not commercial ones. That classification allows buyers to use the same mortgage programs available for single-family homes.
For owner-occupants in particular, that can make a decisive difference. Buyers may qualify for lower down payments, fixed-rate mortgages, and longer repayment terms than they would on larger apartment buildings, which typically require commercial loans with higher rates and shorter timelines.
Apostal notes that buyers can purchase a four-unit building with as little as 5% down, a level of financing that isn’t available once a property crosses into five units or more. With a 30-year repayment schedule, monthly payments tend to be more manageable, and rental income from the other units can help cover those costs from the start.
Not every small apartment building is moving at the same pace. Well-maintained properties with realistic pricing are still attracting strong interest, while overpriced or neglected buildings are sitting longer and seeing more deals fall apart. Buyers are running the numbers carefully and walking away when costs don’t line up. That’s a shift from recent years, when even fixer-uppers drew fast offers.
Two expenses are drawing the most scrutiny: property taxes and insurance. Both have risen quickly in parts of Chicago and can be harder to predict than routine maintenance. Pension-driven tax increases and nationwide insurance hikes have added uncertainty, even in neighborhoods with steady rental demand. Buyers who account for those variables upfront are better positioned to avoid surprises.
Location still matters, but flexibility matters more. Apostal encourages buyers to look just beyond the most competitive neighborhoods – from Bucktown into Avondale, or from Pilsen into Bridgeport – where prices are often more workable and housing stock remains strong. Access to public transit continues to be a key factor, with buildings near the L drawing more consistent interest.
For buyers trying to get into the housing market without overextending, Chicago’s small apartment buildings offer a practical path. Favorable financing for two- to four-unit properties, steady rental demand, and a wide range of neighborhoods give owner-occupants and first-time buyers more flexibility than a traditional single-family purchase.
“If someone is seeking stability,” Apostal says, “Chicago is a great place to start.”
About the Expert: Niko Apostal is the managing broker at Essex Three-Twelve, a Chicago-based brokerage focused on small and mid-sized apartment buildings. He has more than two decades of experience in Chicago real estate and previously founded a property management company that grew to more than 800 units. He also co-founded Keller Williams One Chicago.
This article provides insights into Chicago’s small multifamily market. It does not constitute legal, financial, or investment advice.
Every month we conduct hundreds of interviews with
active market practitioners - thousands to date.
Explore similar articles from Our Team of Experts.


The active adult housing market in Central Florida is expanding beyond traditional retirement hubs, as developers respond to demand for boutique communities that offer accessibility and natu...


Building code compliance is creating sharply different investment outcomes for coastal properties, even when those homes sit just feet apart. Edward Freeman Jr., Managing Partner at The Free...


From 2010 to 2023, property values in Arizona and much of the U.S. rose steadily, creating a hidden safety net for both lenders and borrowers. Geoff Ball, a hard money lender with two decade...


Just a few years ago, healthy building certification was primarily the domain of high-end office buildings. Developers and corporate tenants competed to offer better air quality, natural lig...


The race to decarbonize America’s cities has created a new asset class that’s capturing attention from institutional investors—urban energy storage. As renewable energy sources...


The Atlanta real estate market is approaching a pivotal moment, with local experts noting early signs of renewed momentum even as many buyers remain hesitant due to elevated interest rates. ...
