

Amid growing market uncertainty, private lending expert Philip Bennett argues that experience in evaluating distressed commercial real estate assets has become more crucial than ever, partic...




For many Chicago buyers, the traditional path to homeownership is getting harder to follow. Higher mortgage rates and rising single-family home prices have pushed monthly payments beyond what feels workable. As a result, more buyers are rethinking what ownership looks like – and turning to small apartment buildings instead.
“We’re seeing a lot less institutional money going into these smaller properties these days,” says Niko Apostal, managing broker at Essex Three-Twelve in Chicago. “It’s mostly individuals.” Many of those buyers are people planning to live in one unit of a two- to four-unit building while renting out the others, using that income to help cover the mortgage.
These modest multi-unit buildings – often tucked onto residential side streets or sitting above neighborhood storefronts – are selling steadily. For buyers priced out of single-family homes, they offer a more workable entry point into ownership, combining a place to live with rental income that makes the numbers easier to manage.
Two- to four-unit buildings are a familiar part of Chicago’s housing landscape, particularly in older, walkable neighborhoods built before single-family zoning became dominant. Across much of the city, small multi-unit buildings line residential side streets and sit above storefronts on commercial corridors – meaning rental units are woven into everyday neighborhoods rather than concentrated in large apartment complexes or isolated developments. That pattern gives Chicago buyers options that are less common in many U.S. markets, where housing stock skews more heavily toward single-family homes or large, investor-owned apartment buildings.
Today, that model is drawing renewed interest as mortgage rates remain elevated and single-family homes feel financially out of reach for many buyers. A small apartment building allows an owner to live in one unit while using rent from the others to offset the mortgage and ongoing costs. Apostal has first-hand experience with this process. “I own three apartments myself,” he says. “The rent from those few units pays for all of my living expenses.” For buyers focused on making ownership workable rather than maximizing scale, that combination can be more realistic than buying a standalone house.
What’s changing isn’t just buyer interest, but availability. Many of Chicago’s two- to four-unit buildings have been owned by the same families for decades. As those longtime owners age or move into assisted living, more of these properties are coming to market – often after years of owner occupancy and regular upkeep.
“We’re seeing a generational handoff,” Apostal says. Buildings that were once held for stability rather than scale are now being sold into a very different housing environment. For buyers, that means more listings that are already rented, functional, and livable, rather than speculative rehabs.
At the same time, institutional buyers remain largely absent from this corner of the market, reducing the kind of bidding pressure that pushed prices sharply higher in previous cycles. Combined with a slower, more deliberate pace of deal-making, that has created a window for individual buyers who are willing to run the numbers carefully and take on small-scale ownership.
One reason two- to four-unit buildings remain accessible to individual buyers is how they’re financed. Under federal lending rules, buildings with up to four units are treated as residential properties, not commercial ones. That classification allows buyers to use the same mortgage programs available for single-family homes.
For owner-occupants in particular, that can make a decisive difference. Buyers may qualify for lower down payments, fixed-rate mortgages, and longer repayment terms than they would on larger apartment buildings, which typically require commercial loans with higher rates and shorter timelines.
Apostal notes that buyers can purchase a four-unit building with as little as 5% down, a level of financing that isn’t available once a property crosses into five units or more. With a 30-year repayment schedule, monthly payments tend to be more manageable, and rental income from the other units can help cover those costs from the start.
Not every small apartment building is moving at the same pace. Well-maintained properties with realistic pricing are still attracting strong interest, while overpriced or neglected buildings are sitting longer and seeing more deals fall apart. Buyers are running the numbers carefully and walking away when costs don’t line up. That’s a shift from recent years, when even fixer-uppers drew fast offers.
Two expenses are drawing the most scrutiny: property taxes and insurance. Both have risen quickly in parts of Chicago and can be harder to predict than routine maintenance. Pension-driven tax increases and nationwide insurance hikes have added uncertainty, even in neighborhoods with steady rental demand. Buyers who account for those variables upfront are better positioned to avoid surprises.
Location still matters, but flexibility matters more. Apostal encourages buyers to look just beyond the most competitive neighborhoods – from Bucktown into Avondale, or from Pilsen into Bridgeport – where prices are often more workable and housing stock remains strong. Access to public transit continues to be a key factor, with buildings near the L drawing more consistent interest.
For buyers trying to get into the housing market without overextending, Chicago’s small apartment buildings offer a practical path. Favorable financing for two- to four-unit properties, steady rental demand, and a wide range of neighborhoods give owner-occupants and first-time buyers more flexibility than a traditional single-family purchase.
“If someone is seeking stability,” Apostal says, “Chicago is a great place to start.”
About the Expert: Niko Apostal is the managing broker at Essex Three-Twelve, a Chicago-based brokerage focused on small and mid-sized apartment buildings. He has more than two decades of experience in Chicago real estate and previously founded a property management company that grew to more than 800 units. He also co-founded Keller Williams One Chicago.
This article provides insights into Chicago’s small multifamily market. It does not constitute legal, financial, or investment advice.
Every month we conduct hundreds of interviews with
active market practitioners - thousands to date.
Explore similar articles from Our Team of Experts.


Amid growing market uncertainty, private lending expert Philip Bennett argues that experience in evaluating distressed commercial real estate assets has become more crucial than ever, partic...


The St. Augustine real estate market is demonstrating notable stability compared to other Florida regions experiencing sharper price corrections, according to local market analysis. While th...


Pensacola-based real estate investor Mike Hamby says his dual role as both cash buyer and licensed agent allows him to offer sellers a more transparent choice, though most still opt for spee...


Lenders are changing the way they finance short-term rental (STR) properties, shifting from evaluating buyer creditworthiness to assessing property income performance. This change is alterin...


“What gets measured gets done. You can’t evaluate what you can’t measure.” – Larry Stone, Santa Clara County Assessor In Silicon Valley, where tech innovations and ...


“I consider myself fairly risk tolerant,” says Tanya Ragan, President and CEO of Wildcat Management, a Dallas-based real estate investment and development firm. “I see myse...
