The South Florida condominium market is experiencing a major crisis as maintenance fees soar, reshaping buyer behavior and property values. According to Arkadiy Abdurakhmanov of United Realt...
Monmouth County, New Jersey Sellers Refuse Concessions as Coastal Market Tightens




In Monmouth County, New Jersey, sellers are increasingly unwilling to negotiate on repairs or price reductions, causing deals to fall apart when buyers expect the leverage they had two years ago.
Paul Kaminski, a broker associate with Keller Williams Sports + Entertainment, recently lost a transaction after a buyer requested concessions for mold remediation. Kaminski described the issue as “a little bit of mold” that the buyer could have addressed, but the seller’s stance was firm: no concessions. This standoff is becoming typical in coastal New Jersey markets, where inventory remains limited and prices continue to rise.
Sellers who once offered repairs or credits now hold firm, confident that another buyer will accept the property without demands. Meanwhile, buyers still expect the negotiation power they held in 2022 and 2023, when higher interest rates and slower demand gave buyers more leverage. That leverage has since disappeared, but many buyers have not adjusted.
“The seller says, No, I’m not going to repair anything – you’re buying as is,” Kaminski recalls. When the buyer tried to negotiate, Kaminski told them, “You lost a deal because you asked too much.”
Sellers Hold Firm on Concessions
Kaminski says this shift in seller behavior has become especially pronounced in recent months. “Sellers are not giving as much away as they used to,” he explains. In previous years, buyers could routinely negotiate repairs, closing cost credits, or price reductions based on inspection results. Sellers saw these as a normal part of the process when inventory was higher and buyers had more choices.
Now, in Monmouth and Ocean counties, sellers view concession requests as a sign that buyers are not serious or are trying to renegotiate after already agreeing to terms. Rather than accommodate these requests, sellers walk away and wait for another buyer willing to accept the property as-is.
This approach is effective because inventory remains tight and demand from affluent buyers, especially those relocating from North Jersey or New York City, continues to support higher prices. Sellers know that if one deal falls through, another buyer will likely appear within weeks. The risk of losing a buyer is lower than the cost of making concessions, particularly if those concessions set a precedent for future negotiations.
Kaminski’s lost deal illustrates this new reality. The buyer expected the traditional process, where inspection findings lead to concessions. The seller, confident in the current market, refused. Neither party adjusted, and the transaction collapsed.
Buyers Struggle to Adapt
Kaminski identifies buyer psychology as the main obstacle in today’s market, not affordability or lack of inventory. Many buyers still base their expectations on prices and negotiation dynamics from 2022 or 2023, when the market was softer and sellers were more flexible. Those days are over, but buyers have not fully accepted the change.
“The biggest obstacle is that buyers are unrealistic about the true value of homes here,” Kaminski says. “The price is determined by how much someone is willing to pay for it, not an objective market value.”
Kaminski regularly speaks with buyers who refer to deals their friends made two or three years ago, expecting similar pricing and terms. When Kaminski explains that the same home now costs $200,000 more and sellers are not offering concessions, buyers often react with disbelief or frustration. Some decide to wait, expecting a market correction. Others eventually accept the new reality, but the adjustment causes friction and delays.
“The buyer pool is here. People aren’t ready to pay. In their minds, they’re thinking of old prices from three years ago. Now, it’s $200,000 more,” Kaminski says.
This lag in buyer expectations is common in markets that have seen rapid price growth. Buyers often need to lose out on several properties before accepting the new market reality. The question is how long this adjustment will take and whether it will slow demand enough to give buyers more leverage.
Risks for Overconfident Sellers
Sellers hold the advantage now, but Kaminski’s experience points to potential risks if market conditions shift. Sellers who refuse all concessions are betting that another buyer will accept the property as-is. If inventory increases or demand softens, that confidence may backfire.
Kaminski notes that sellers in Monmouth and Ocean counties do not currently face this risk, as demand remains strong. The pattern of refusing to negotiate even minor issues suggests a level of confidence that could become a liability if market dynamics change. Sellers accustomed to a take-it-or-leave-it approach may struggle if they suddenly need to compete for buyers.
The larger question is whether this negotiating environment will last. If buyers continue to accept higher prices without concessions, today’s dynamic could persist. If buyers pull back and wait for better terms, sellers may need to offer concessions again.
Fewer Deals Close Overall
The breakdown in negotiations is affecting more than individual deals. When buyers and sellers cannot reach an agreement, transactions collapse, reducing overall market activity. Kaminski’s lost deal is one example, but if this pattern is widespread, it could lead to fewer completed sales even in areas with strong demand.
Lower transaction volumes do not necessarily signal a weak market. They can indicate a disconnect between buyer expectations and seller positions. If this mismatch continues, the market could see fewer sales even as prices climb. This benefits existing homeowners who are not selling but creates challenges for buyers trying to enter the market and for agents who rely on transaction volume.
Kaminski’s experience shows that agents are caught between managing buyer expectations and representing sellers who refuse to compromise. Deals are harder to close, even when both parties are motivated. Whether this represents a short-term adjustment or a longer-term shift in how coastal real estate is negotiated remains uncertain.
Market Outlook
The standoff between buyers and sellers is changing how deals are made in coastal New Jersey. Sellers have the upper hand for now, but the market’s future depends on whether buyers adjust to higher prices and fewer concessions or whether persistent resistance forces sellers to soften their stance.
Agents like Kaminski are navigating a market where successful transactions require buyers to accept as-is sales and higher prices, while sellers risk losing deals if they overplay their hand. The next phase of the market will reveal whether this rigid negotiating style is sustainable or whether a new balance will emerge as buyers and sellers recalibrate their expectations.
This article was sourced from a live expert interview.
Every month we conduct hundreds of interviews with
active market practitioners - thousands to date.
Similar Articles
Explore similar articles from Our Team of Experts.


Miami’s luxury real estate landscape is undergoing a dramatic transformation driven by an influx of young tech professionals, forcing mature buildings to rethink their amenity offering...


Expert argues slight interest rate changes could trigger significant market movement through psychological rather than financial impact. The current real estate market stagnation might be so...


Over the past five years, roughly 30 to 40 companies have tried to tokenize real estate assets using blockchain technology. According to David Rose, founder and CEO of USREM and a fifth-gene...


The triple net lease property market is undergoing a notable shift in investor demographics, according to Ayson Shammami, Managing Partner at APEX Commercial Real Estate Advisors. In a recen...


