Development Capital Finds Its Footing as Traditional Real Estate Financing Pulls Back

Written by:

Steve Marcinuk

Date:

31 Mar 2026

Share

Share via Facebook

Share via Linkedin

Share via X

Copy to clipboard

The real estate development finance sector has faced significant disruption over the past two years, but specialized lenders are finding openings as traditional banks step back from construction and development loans. For firms focused on this niche, the current market combines new risks and fresh opportunities, with relationship-driven capital providers stepping into gaps left by retreating conventional lenders.

Andy Klein, Managing Partner at Lionheart Strategic Management, has spent his career navigating the ups and downs of real estate finance. His path in residential mortgage origination just before the 2008 financial crisis, followed by graduate studies and roles in institutional investing, has given him direct experience with market volatility and the need for adaptive capital strategies.

Klein’s beginnings in mortgage origination exposed him to the challenges of the pre-crisis lending environment, a perspective that now informs his approach to development finance.

Relationship-Driven Deal Sourcing

Unlike lenders competing on razor-thin margins, Lionheart relies on trust, reputation, and direct relationships to source deals. Klein notes that about one-third of their business comes through brokers, while the remaining two-thirds comes from direct connections with sponsors or referrals from banks.

“We’re not the type of capital where we’re winning or losing deals over five or ten basis points of rate,” Klein says. Instead, the firm’s edge comes from its ability to move quickly, understand complex situations, and maintain strong relationships with sponsors.

This approach has proven especially valuable in the current market, where many institutional lenders have pulled back. As competition for development deals has eased, disciplined firms like Lionheart can maintain underwriting standards and aim to capture higher risk premiums.

Lionheart typically focuses on the higher-yielding, value-add segment of the development capital stack — often providing mezzanine or preferred equity investments rather than traditional senior loans. This position offers several potential advantages: it ensures that sponsors have significant cash equity invested ahead of Lionheart, reduces the risk of inflated appraisals, and offers the possibility to achieve enhanced returns for investors willing to take on more complexity.

Geographic Shifts and Asset Class Focus

Lionheart’s geographic strategy has evolved alongside broader migration and investment trends. The firm’s first fund (2017-2019) invested heavily in Nashville, while its second vehicle (2020-2022) was centered on Miami, reflecting the post-pandemic migration to Sun Belt cities.

Klein observes that their current vehicle (2023 vintage) is swinging back toward top-tier urban markets such as New York, Chicago, Boston, Washington, D.C., and Los Angeles. “You’re seeing a retrenchment in the urban core and real employment growth in markets where it’s much harder to add supply than in Austin or Houston, for example, where there’s probably overbuilding,” he says.

Lionheart generally targets the 20 largest U.S. metropolitan areas by population, but remains flexible when high-quality opportunities emerge in smaller, fast-growing cities. Klein describes their geographic rules as “written in pencil rather than pen.”

On the asset side, about two-thirds to three-quarters of Lionheart’s portfolio is devoted to residential development. This includes ground-up multifamily projects and land infrastructure intended for future residential use. The emphasis on housing reflects both strong supply-and-demand fundamentals and greater liquidity than other property types.

“You can’t AI bedrooms,” Klein says. “People need to rest their heads at night and live somewhere. That’s generally our take.” This focus on housing has insulated the firm from some of the volatility affecting office and retail development.

Evolving Bank Roles and Capital Structures

The narrative that private capital is replacing banks in real estate lending is only partly accurate. Klein notes that banks remain active, but their involvement often takes new forms.

Previously, banks provided the most senior tranche of capital in a development deal, holding the primary mortgage. Now, banks increasingly provide leverage to non-bank lenders like Lionheart, taking security interests in those loans rather than in the underlying property.

Klein explains, “A firm like Lionheart can lend the full amount, but will back-lever that with leverage provided by a bank. Their security interest is now secured by Lionheart’s underlying loan rather than direct mortgage collateral.” This arrangement allows banks to remain in the market while achieving more favorable capital treatment and lower reserve requirements, effectively increasing their lending capacity through structured finance.

This shift has expanded the role of development specialists, who now serve as both lenders and intermediaries, structuring deals that meet the needs of sponsors and banks alike. It also means that firms like Lionheart must be adept at managing both credit and relationship risk.

Managing Risk in a Volatile Market

Despite the turbulence of recent years, Klein remains optimistic about the outlook for development finance, especially in residential sectors. Klein acknowledges that success often depends on creative problem-solving and careful coordination.

In complex, multi-party development deals, maintaining clear communication and alignment among all stakeholders is critical.

Looking forward, Klein sees continued opportunity in markets with real supply constraints — whether due to limited land, entitlement challenges, or the expiration of local tax incentives. He emphasizes that operational expertise, drawn from the Fisher Brothers’ long history, gives Lionheart an edge in handling complicated projects and navigating regulatory hurdles.

The firm’s disciplined underwriting and hands-on approach have enabled it to capitalize on the current environment, in which fewer competitors are willing or able to take on development risk. As traditional bank lending remains constrained, relationship-driven specialists are well-positioned to fill the gap.

The Road Ahead

For development finance specialists like Lionheart, today’s market offers a rare mix of reduced competition, strong housing demand, and the need for creative capital solutions. Firms that combine operational knowledge with flexible capital structures can address the growing complexity of modern projects — whether through mezzanine debt, preferred equity, or bespoke financing arrangements.

As capital markets remain in flux, the most successful players will most likely be those who can adapt quickly, maintain strong relationships, and evaluate risk in real time. Klein believes that the next phase of development lending will reward firms that stay close to the fundamentals: understanding local markets, underwriting conservatively, and investing alongside sponsors with real equity at stake.

In a landscape where traditional bank financing continues to recede, development capital is finding its footing by prioritizing expertise, discipline, and the ability to solve for complexity. For those positioned to meet these demands, the current market environment is not just survivable — it’s a source of opportunity.