Real estate expert Jessica Randolph is challenging one of the industry’s most sacred principles. “It’s not location, location, location, it’s Price, Condition, Locati...
The Baltimore, Maryland–Washington, D.C. Corridor Is Recovering, Just Not Everywhere at Once




The Baltimore-Washington corridor is often cited as one of the more stable commercial real estate markets in the country. And by broad measures, that reputation holds. But stability at the regional level can hide significant variation at the ground level – and for businesses making location decisions based on headline numbers, that gap can lead them to overpay for space, underestimate vacancy risk, or choose a location that quietly works against them from day one.
Evan Langert, Founder and Managing Director of The Langert Commercial Group, has spent 40 years working across this corridor, and the picture he describes is less a uniform recovery and more a market of distinct neighborhoods, each moving at its own pace.
Not All Submarkets Recover Together
Two locations can sit just miles apart and behave like completely different markets. K Street in downtown Washington and Tysons Corner in Virginia have seen significantly higher vacancy rates than most Maryland submarkets. Within Maryland, Bethesda has struggled more than Columbia or Annapolis, with vacancy rates in some areas running roughly double those of others.
What drives those differences? A mix of factors: the density of government-adjacent tenants, the age and quality of the building stock, how much new office space was built before demand collapsed, and whether the businesses in that area need customers or employees to show up in person or can function just as well with people working from home. Where supply outpaced demand before the pandemic, some areas are still working through that excess today. A business choosing between two seemingly similar locations in adjacent zip codes may be choosing between two locations with very different odds of staying occupied and financially viable over time.
Not All Property Types Recover Equally
Geography is only part of the picture. The type of space a business occupies shapes its recovery just as much as its location does.
In uncertain periods, tenants tend to prioritize value over prestige. High-end office space – what the industry calls Class A – has seen higher rates of empty, unleased space than mid-tier or lower-tier buildings. When budgets tighten and the future feels uncertain, businesses stop chasing prestigious addresses and start prioritizing space that simply works at a price that makes sense. “When people are nervous in times that look daunting, they don’t want to spend the extra money to have a big, high-profile office,” Langert observes.
Industrial space has held up differently – driven by the need for warehouse and shipping space close to major highways and delivery hubs rather than by how many people are coming into an office each week. Retail and restaurant spaces follow their own logic entirely, shaped by foot traffic, parking access, and the daily routines of nearby residents. The corridor is recovering, but depending on what kind of space a business needs, that recovery may look very different.
Location Details That Drive Performance
For businesses that interact directly with customers – retailers, restaurants, service providers – the difference between a good location and a struggling one often comes down to details that don’t appear in a lease agreement.
Which side of the road a business sits on, for instance, can determine whether commuters stop in or drive past. A coffee shop on the wrong side of a busy suburban road faces a built-in obstacle unrelated to the quality of the business itself. “Most people are not going to make a left turn across traffic to go to your place to get coffee,” Langert notes. “So you need to be on that side where people are going to work in the morning.”
Parking access carries similar weight. A location with distant lots, difficult entry points, or high parking costs can underperform consistently regardless of its other strengths. For office tenants, the critical variable is often whether employees can realistically get there – and whether the location can attract and retain the people a business needs. One company based in rural Maryland found that engineers recruited from Washington or Baltimore would decline offers or leave within weeks simply because of the commute. The fix wasn’t a better salary. It was a second office in a more accessible location.
Why This Market Has a Floor
What distinguishes the Baltimore-Washington corridor from most major markets is a stabilizing force that holds steady even when the broader economy slows down: the federal government.
Government spending continues regardless of which party holds power, and the contractors, agencies, and service providers that depend on it tend to cluster around it. That demand doesn’t disappear during downturns the way private-sector demand can. Langert, who spent nearly two decades working in California before returning to the Washington area in 2010, saw the contrast clearly during the post-2008 recovery. Silicon Valley had half-empty shopping centers and large, newly built office buildings sitting vacant next to other vacant buildings. The DC area showed far more resilience – empty storefronts here and there, rather than entire blocks left unused.
That floor doesn’t mean every location in the corridor is a safe bet. But it does mean the region’s recovery, uneven as it is, is driven by real, consistent demand – not just optimism about where the market might go.
About the Expert: Evan Langert is Founder and Managing Director of The Langert Commercial Group, with 40 years of experience across the Baltimore-Washington corridor. His background includes serving as head transactional attorney for the eastern United States at a multi-billion-dollar publicly traded REIT and working with a California-based family office with holdings across all five major commercial property types.
This article is based on information provided by the expert source cited above. It is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or real estate advice. Readers should conduct their own research and consult qualified professionals before making any real estate or financial decisions.
This article was sourced from a live expert interview.
Every month we conduct hundreds of interviews with
active market practitioners - thousands to date.
Similar Articles
Explore similar articles from Our Team of Experts.


Fernando Olloqui’s path from Wall Street to Latin American construction technology exemplifies how deep industry pain points often spark innovation. A 2007 graduate of Worcester Polyte...


When people think about investing in Florida real estate, they usually picture beachfront condos or luxury vacation rentals. But one veteran agent in Southwest Florida says the real opportun...


The South Jersey shore real estate market is outpacing national trends, operating under conditions that set it apart from most residential sectors. While many U.S. markets slow under the wei...


“We’re in the business of making housing more affordable, and we recognize that the key lever is increasing housing supply,” says Gillian Pressman, Managing Director of YIM...


